During his recent visit to India, Jack had a “closed door” meeting with some people from Indian media who are regularly identified with left leaning and pro-minority activism groups. He held a plackart that had a message “Smash Brahmanical Patriarchy” that targeted a community which constitutes less than 5% of the population of India. He was questioned by many for his act on Twitter by many - “why selective attack? Why Twitter had biases in deactivating user accounts...etc.,.”
When it stirred enough discussions and debates, Twitter legal head of India came up stating Jack was gifted with that memento and he did not know the actual impact that could cause. This was again protested by the fellow journalists who attended that meeting.
Having said this, the current CEOs of Microsoft, Google and heads of many other global companies hail from the same community and there is no special reservation for this as well as some other communities in education or government jobs in India.How appropriate it is for a Social Media company to display biased support???
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey courts controversy for posing with 'anti-Brahmin poster'
As a follower of @followforupvotes this post has been randomly selected and upvoted! Enjoy your upvote and have a great day!
Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 8,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 11
Ways you can help the @informationwar
Congratulations @mindreader! You received a personal award!
Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 1 year!
Click here to view your Board