The Democrats continue to have an excellent chance to win control of the House, despite their lead falling on some generic polls, according to Stuart Rothenberg, but The Washington Post indicates a problem which could harm the Democrats in 2018 and 2020, as in 2016: Hillary Clinton reentering politics.
The Washington Post writes:
In the first electoral season since the stunning loss that extinguished her years-long drive for the presidency, Clinton, 70, has begun a discreet and low-profile reentry into the political fray.Her emerging 2018 strategy, according to more than a dozen friends and advisers familiar with her plans, is to leverage the star power she retains in some Democratic circles on behalf of select candidates while remaining sufficiently below the radar to avoid becoming a useful target for Republicans seeking to rile up their base.
Most likely, they said, Clinton will attempt to help Democratic candidates who have a history of supporting her and her family, and expending her political capital in a number of the 23 congressional districts she won in 2016 but are now held by a Republican. Lending a hand to Democrats organizing at a grass-roots level is a priority, they added.
She will be supporting the politicians who have supported the Clintons in the past--in other words, conservative Democrats, and the types of Democrats who lost in 2010, 2014, and 2016.
The most ominous line in the article is: "Clinton friends expect that she will be an influential figure in 2020 — as a potential kingmaker, or queen maker, in the Democratic presidential scramble."
Since losing the 2016 election, Clinton has spent her time attacking the left, spreading pro-war hysteria, and undermining fundamental principles of Democracy, including freedom of speech and the acceptance of election results by the losing candidate.
While the Democrats should be able to do well in 2018 with the well-deserved unpopularity of Donald Trump and the Republican Party, long term their future depends upon whether or not they continue to be a Republican-lite Party, running on a platform of being just a little less crazy than the Republicans. In January The Intercept warned that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is trying to prevent progressive candidates from running:
...the DCCC, its allied groups, or leaders within the Democratic Party are working hard against some of these new candidates for Congress, publicly backing their more established opponents, according to interviews with more than 50 candidates, party operatives, and members of Congress. Winning the support of Washington heavyweights, including the DCCC — implicit or explicit — is critical for endorsements back home and a boost to fundraising. In general, it can give a candidate a tremendous advantage over opponents in a Democratic primary.It is also discouraging that many of the same people who handed Hillary Clinton the nomination in 2016, which led to the election of Donald Trump, continue to lead the DNC, with progressive members having been purged last fall. So far the DNC has not adopted the recommendations of the Unity Commission, which were rather tame and did not go far enough to reform the Democratic Party.In district after district, the national party is throwing its weight behind candidates who are out of step with the national mood. The DCCC — known as “the D-trip” in Washington — has officially named 18 candidates as part of its “Red to Blue” program. (A D-trip spokesperson cautioned that a red-to-blue designation is not an official endorsement, but functions that way in practice. Program designees get exclusive financial and strategy resources from the party.) In many of those districts, there is at least one progressive challenger the party is working to elbow aside, some more viable than others. Outside of those 18, the party is coalescing in less formal ways around a chosen candidate — such as in the case of Pennsylvania’s Hartman — even if the DCCC itself is not publicly endorsing.
On the other hand, there are signs of hope. The Intercept reported earlier this month that, AT LEAST SIX progressive insurgents managed to out-raise their establishment Democratic opponents in House races in the final quarter of 2017, a stunning development that threatens to upend the way the party goes about selecting candidates." Yesterday Politco reported that, "Progressive insurgents are launching challenges to Democratic members of Congress in some of the country’s bluest districts, sparked by deep frustration with the party establishment and anti-Trump anger."
The future of the Democratic Party must be on standing for principles, not seeing more of Hillary Clinton, who embodies what is most rotten in our politics.
Originally posted at: http://bit.ly/2EFeWQJ
The DNC screwed itself by cheating Bernie out of a chance.
They may... MAY have a chance with Elizabeth Warren down the road, presuming she even wants to run in the first place (which, in the past, she said wasn't in the cards).
Nice Coattails, eh:
Most of us Lefties called it. "She might beat Drumpf but will get clobbered down ballot as ALL the Republicans will turn out against her, and the ones who hold their nose for her will vote R for everything else."
It was an easy prediction. That didn't stop it from being ridiculed. Another instance of the people who were correct not being allowed to speak or put into a position to fix things.
Fivethirtyeight.com also wrote about how Clinton cost the Democrats Congressional seats, as I cited in this post:
http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2017/07/24/the-democratic-leadership-has-failed-to-give-a-good-reason-why-their-party-should-continue-to-exist/
538 Blew it. I was part of the Purge in the Ides of March from the Great Orange Satan. They were completely delirious over there.
I got really freaked out with the gaslighting that happened in the run up to, and especially after the election. Those cats LOST THEIR MINDS!!!
Poblano was cool. Nate? Not so much. He, like most of the Democratic Establishment, is stuck serving two masters. Got to make the calculations to paint the issues if you want to pay the bills. Kudos on him for admitting what the data says. He's doing much better than most of them.