I reckon there's truth to both, however I know there is very little to no censorship in independent news outlets based in the US and UK, they benefit more from getting all the facts out there and being (mostly) unbiased.
However, it does depend on the viewpoint of the author of the article - that's why I looked at a few sources.
I'm not sure what Russian media have said about this, but I'm going to guess they don't want Syria bombed either.
Russian media says the there was no chemical attack in Syria.The video that the world's channels show is fiction and lie. US started to bomb Syria right the day before the Health committee starts to work. I don't know why Russia stays like a brickwall in Syria and defend it? May be because NATO goes closer snd closer to russian borders. The other side the USA have very big natnal debt and the war is a business like you said as i remember.
Russia has lots of inner problems, and Putin's regime tries to distract people from it. And of course, Putin wants to defend Assad's system similar to the Russian one.
Yeah, I'd struggle to believe that Russian media is telling the truth and the rest of the world's news is lying; but it's possible.
Russian television for the past 15 years turns the population into stupid sheep and entirely succeeded in this.
It's also all about money and oil too.
Agree. But inner problems are not the reason to start WW3. I see that Putin don't want to use bombs until the last.
It's also quite tricky to start WW3 when all yours and your friends' families members live in Europe and US. But when you alone manage such big country on your own and you far not so young everything is possible and WW3 as well.