Great post. Just to add, that sometimes public sentiment can be seriously flawed by government´s manipulation of the media. If the AI relies on the public sentiment it will be biased towards what the government wants us to believe. Current example is the in fact illegal mass migration into middle Europe where we see a strong bias of public media towards the benefits of the migration and suppression of its negative consequences. I have no idea how it ever could be accomplished that an AI screens through the internet, picks up all of the very contrary information, and summarizes this into an opinion. Probably as impossible a defining the truth out of 1000 contradicting facts.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Exactly why I mentioned personal morality. Sometimes it is the case that public sentiment (and ethics) are manipulated by propaganda from many different foreign governments and or the local government. AI has to not "rely" on public sentiment but factor it into it's cost benefit analysis. It's the same thing corporations do and to some extent individuals.
Everyhting is very nice but u are using the AI just for to mantain the status quo we have til now that is not the best! I will ask just something ... if we start to use AI for everything ... why do we need humans for? Maybe would be better to fix how the govermment work, how politics is done and so ... but of course it is more easy to let other to think for us and made the dirty work so we do not feel guilty any more of our mistakes.