In Spain, a dogmatic argument is still maintained as the centre of the debate between men and women. For both radical and moderate Spanish feminist groups, the aggressor is always the man without taking into account that not all men are rapists nor all men are aggressors, these "pseudo-activists" seek to be legitimized not only by the Spanish population but also by the whole world with their fallacies in generalization that even a small child does not believe.
Taking into account that in Spain there are around 23 million men and last year only 1,000 men were sentenced for cases of crimes against sexual freedom, the result is that only 0.0004% are sexual offenders. And this is if you assume that there were no men who violated someone else's sexual freedom more than once. What cannot be done, therefore, is to point out all men as aggressors and rapists. The Spanish feminist argument seeking to implement its dictatorship of thought seeks precisely this. These generalizations become even worse when the main focus is on the white, heterosexual man.
These feminist groups seek to blame white and heterosexual men and to exonerate any other ethnic group, thus ignoring the fact that in Spain around 300 murders are committed each year, 53 of which are carried out by the Moroccan immigrant population, despite the fact that only as a group they represent 1.5% of the total population in Spain. But like any group whose ideological foundations and ethical principles revolve around the spectrum of the left, it does not set itself the goal that a Moroccan is more likely to commit murder than a Spaniard himself. And even less is to blame for the growth of crime in Spain since the Middle East migration crisis.
As the same story always ends up repeating itself, the problem is the white man without taking into account cases such as the fact that 939 terrorist attacks were carried out in 2017 and just over 10,000 people died at the hands of fundamentalist extremists, and if we analyze and compare these statistics of 2017 with those of previous years, it would be even worse.
But what don't you say? The media and left-wing groups do not generalize when it comes to talking about Muslims or Moroccans, which is all well and good, since not all of them are murderers, let alone criminals, only a small part of them are, minority groups. The problem lies in the fact that left-wing groups and feminists are trying to blame the white and heterosexual men who, according to statistics, commit the least atrocious acts. So why is it that in some cases they do not generalize and in others they do? If they differentiate between immigrants and criminals, and between Muslims and fundamentalists, then they should not make a distinction between men and rapists and not put them all in the same sandbag.
As we have seen, this rhetoric has no logic or reason to be sustained, however, as we are in the post-truth era where relativity and perspectives matter more than facts and reality we see cases like the following:
This type of news only leaves in view the fact that all over Europe an ideological dictatorship is being tried to impose itself that segregates and segregates society in certain tasks.
There are two types of criminal law, on the one hand we have the criminal law of act and the criminal law of author. The criminal law of act is that which is proper to democratic states, states of law and freedom consists of sentencing the detractors of a criminal act for what they themselves do, that is, if a person carries out a criminal conduct that person has to face the consequences before the law, only if he or she carries out a criminal conduct. For example: If a person kills, that person is punished.
On the other hand we have the very common law of authoritarian states the author's criminal law, which is based on intervention. Unlike criminal law of act, it does not focus on the actions of individuals, but rather on what they are, that is, if a person is part of a group considered harmful and prejudicial, they face problems with the law even if they have not performed an act of which they are guilty. Very similar to the case of Jews in Germany and so it is with any minority group that is not accepted as Blacks, Gays, Gypsies, etc.. It's not about the action, it's about who you are.
And this is why these actions taken by some European governments only call into question how the current states are becoming authoritarian states and then putting author's criminal law before criminal law of action. The above measures prohibit men from entering certain areas not because of what men have committed or can potentially do but because they are are men. Feminists maintain the argument that men, because they are men, should be excluded because they are "potential" rapists, criminals, murderers and mistreaters even though they have no criminal record.
Turning to the case of sexual assaults in 2017, what have 99% of men certainly done to be accused of rapist and abuser? Nothing, what we see is a group of ideological foundations wanting to impose a segregated society where men are punished for being men and women can position themselves in the highest social stratum simply because they are women, where has this been seen before?
- In Communist China
- In Communist Russia
- In Nazi Germany
- In Facist Italy
Where groups have sought to blame a minority and tried to escalate and hold the power with that rhetoric or argument, making everyone think that what they are doing is based on a righteous cause that will profit the whole society when in fact they become more and more harmful state.
Some examples where the generalization of the individuality of the people prelates. It is not curious, then, that all societies based on the author's criminal law have been societies based on collectivism. It is necessary then to express our opinion on this case, which, although it may seem minimal for the time being, we do not know how far it can go.
We must reflect on the fact that this unique thinking that we are currently trying to impose on us has so many parallels and so many common features with the most authoritarian societies and where more human rights violations have taken place.
Posted from my blog with SteemPress : Here
Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 8,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 11
Ways you can help the @informationwar
Things are going to be worst
I agree with you in most of your stated principals. Sadly however when you misuse the world "common law" and redefine it when in fact it is a lawful practice in law. Well I don't see how the results of such can be good.
"On the other hand we have the very common law of authoritarian states the author's criminal law, which is based on intervention."
Such is not law nor is it common law. It is sexist, bias and prejudice. It most certainly is not law. Common Law is actually the solution to such social problems. Common Law is a method or process. What people believe can be truth or a Ly. Common Law requires proof. If such thinking fly's the logical conditions in society will change to a condition of no law at all.
The following is a good description of Common Law.
"Unlike criminal law of act"
Thanks for your comment.
I was not referring to 'Common Law' I was just using common as an adjective, something that is very usual in authoritarian states which is the author's criminal law.
Congratulations @thoughtsin-time! You have completed the following achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPDo not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
SteemitBoard and the Veterans on Steemit - The First Community Badge.