I have written about the importance to the public discussion of real journalists reporting real facts in response to Univision's Jorge Ramos and MSNBC Mike Brzezinski both saying they cannot cover the facts with objectivity and neutrality and how Julian Assange of Wikileaks may be the only real journalist left.
Now it appears the mighty Google is censoring search results to protect Hillary Clinton. For example, Paul Joseph Watson tweeted this comparison between Google and Yahoo! search results. It makes one wonder if he will be banned like Milo Yiannopoulos was for his political speech.
This is very curious behavior from Google. Are they really censoring search results for political purposes? What do you think? Is this good or bad for the public discourse and discussion?
Yes google is censoring the search results in favor of Hillary Clinton, as google donates money to her campaign. Furthermore, Paul Joseph Watson and Infowars are also helping Hillary Clinton and the establishment agenda. The alt right conspiracy exposed by RedSilverJ:
Facebook is also doing their part for their komrades (https://steemit.com/steemit/@blakemiles84/facebook-censoring-more-political-speech-target-of-opportunity-for-steemit)
A few years back I heard about a website that discussed the " body count " of the Clinton's. As of the last few months, I haven't been able to find it on Google. Today I checked Bing and it was the first link on the list.
Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.
There is nothing new under the sun...
He'll be banned, however, any luck...... Hillary will be out of commission.
Maybe this is another reason why Steemit is the future!
The words of Jimi Hendrix comes to mind:
Source: politics-war, via venicebianca
HIstory will remember Google as dark times of software evolution and pick name google gulag.