@dantheman in my view down voting shouldn't be an option on site like this. It is only a tool for manipulation by more powerful members. If people don't like something they shouldn't read it and only number of positive votes, comments and views should count. If post is bad or of no interests nobody wil look at it anyway. This is how things work in life. Only in politics opponents will undermine each other. Do you want this platform to resemble politics. Do you think that members like @berniesanders who is down voting @dollarvigilante represents values of democratic community? I don't think so. Keep in mind that pool of money to be minded is inexhaustible. You can create as much money as possible if anyone wants to look at your content. People like @berniesanders should be simply not allowed to hold that much power because they don't belong to free world. They belong to corrupted world of banksters and corrupted world of politics. Don't transfer models of corruption from the world, which you are trying to replace because you will be replaced sooner than you think if you allow people to be divided. People should do what they like and if you don't like it find a place which will match your interests. And thank you @tuck-fheman for voicing your opinion. It is on the spot.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
And who is to decide that @berniesanders "doesn't belong to the free world"? Some special committee?
I'm not a big fan of @berniesanders but I respect his right to do whatever he wants with his votes. What you propose the opposite of freedom - it's a total tyranny.