It's such a difficult one because the spread of wealth is the same as almost every walk of life, with a small percentage of users controlling a huge percentage of the overall stake. When we have users abusing the platform it's all well and good for 1000 minnows to chime in and downvote, but one whale upvote still dwarfs them. They are also the ones who's rep can be totally destroyed by whales as has been seen in retaliation voting earlier this year. It's hard not to have that fear when your downvote is little more than symbolic. Unfortunately the abusers of the system are very unlikely to listen to reason, yes, they have the most to lose long term. But I don't believe any of the real abusers are in this for the long term. Unfortunately if no whales step up it will get to the point that they run this platform to the ground, gaining almost total control for themselves and pummeling the value with it.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If they drive the price down, and I agree they will. It is a great entry point for others to buy in. With our current ability to manage the content, we are likely over valued at this point.