honestly, honey, i don't think it takes ethics. in fact the less you think about ethics, the better blank canvas you will be for men projecting them on you something effortless to value.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
honestly, honey, i don't think it takes ethics. in fact the less you think about ethics, the better blank canvas you will be for men projecting them on you something effortless to value.
so let me explain further. the dow is based on war, universally. the law is for the people under god, and there is no heir in the law. the dow with war with men that are thieve-n-d- speaking for d ew/e, with 2-dud-e-w/e-d-s- (t-) u-b0rn-(d-) ew/e- d- can make you fiction-nail- money and you can stand there half naked, for fiction-nail- t/h e (v) a L/L (h) u e w/e i.d. ew/e . you have changed nothing, contributed nothing, brought no value in follow thrue, then you pose your ample breasts, b.c. isn't this what all the grammer is meant to frame "LOOK AT MY TITS AND ASS-K-T-" is a form and forum of competition for-(k-) t- (n0) re-ass- 0/n- e- (a-) t- hie-ven-d-
you tooling a look -t- to make some one stare, and in your own character reference, you are not the heir, nor d ew/e i.d. e/b t (h) in (e) a re (a) p (t) a (i) r e AD, you are tooling a look and a stare, to be in the red. and red character reference is all you lend, no thoughtful contribution e tu be (A)D
m 0/d e (a) L/L (h) D , me ye ass (k) t ~ (u/b) re ad
you are merely a value tu-be- d-(h-) 0- L-(e-) D-