The reporter is taking a hypothetical and treating it as fact.
That IS fake news, regardless of how disturbing. The subject on camera is NOT a union official and can't speak as such.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The reporter is taking a hypothetical and treating it as fact.
That IS fake news, regardless of how disturbing. The subject on camera is NOT a union official and can't speak as such.
What? the Union President is not a union official? Defending "hypothetical" abuse of children is "fake news"?.... Not sure what your point is...
Exactly what part of "Former President of the union" constitutes "union official"?
Yes, presenting a response to a hypothetical as an actual event IS "fake news".
WTF are you talking about? Both "former" and current presidents, and current teaching consultants say the same thing:
Not sure why you are grasping at straws here... public government institutions are best to avoid if people can.