There are many situations where your content can coincidentally resemble that of another content in somewhere different and it will look as if it is plaglarise.
For example
Jesus is Lord
This statement Jesus is Lord has already existed and I'm not the first person to write or create a contents of the word Jesus is Lord.
So if I use the plaglarism checker of that content then it will bring everywhere this content Jesus is Lord has ever existed and that does not really mean one plaglarise or copied the content from one place.
This situation can happen many times when one is creating a sport content or a general news and most especially the headlines of the content you want to create are mostly or likely being so similar to many others who have created it.
So can there be way to differentiate that?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
@vikbuddy and @hannahhive:
Common phrases are a different matter entirely. If the plagiarism check flags common phrases, then there's no action you should take against the user. However, if the user is pasting complete sentences from another source, then they are obligated to cite the source of their material.
Regarding sports content or anything else for that matter, again, it's the responsibility of the author to make sure the audience is aware that the information presented is not their own.
Yeah that's true and very common. But that's not a big worry because it can be clearly seen once found the source of articles. Also important is to catch the once who simply copy full articles or paragraphs and simply paste it.