A nice bit of clarification and insight @calumam. I do appreciate and understand both sides of this discussion so to speak. I think something along the lines of my suggestions in my response above to @onealfa may be finessed into something that satisfies all parties' interests :-) I'm all for resolving issues as far as possible to create win-win situations for involved stakeholders. But then I'm still new here and don't fully appreciate the history of the platform yet and the input that you have all given to support it's growth and development to this point, including your good selves supporting new and diverse authors as they join the platform, so literally just my 2 cents worth lol. It must not be forgotten that the authorial rewards that you have earned on these auto upvotes (which you would probably have got if he had manually voted anyway, and which are probably mostly deserved), are being used by you to drive support of other authors on the platform through your own staked POB and curation efforts. Big picture view is definitely required :-)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It would be great to hear @onealfa's opinion on your comment. He has 5 years experience on Hive and Steemit so I'm sure he knows a thing or two about content.
Glad you were able to see the two sides of the story, it helps with understanding how the platform really is. Too many people get sucked up in the narratives and don't do proper research (which is fair enough and understandable if some don't have the time, but it isn't a good look).
I agree. It's the age old...look before you leap...think before you speak thing again. There are some sound points made on both sides of the arguement (or discussion as I'd prefer to call it lol). As "voters" we are obligated to inform ourselves before we cast. The same applies to politics...and life :-)