Your approach is sound for the first level of screening. There are others that I'm learning now that are much more complicated. It certainly appears unintentional at times. Admitting to the error speaks volumes and minimizes the pain on both the author and the moderator. For instance, when one particular user immediately admitted the mistake, the focus of my ire was only that one article they faulted on. If the person doesn't respond, or denies the evidence presented, then I start scanning all their articles in a seven-day period.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: