This is indeed a cause of concern for someone with such a heavy stake. I have even seen like a 300-400 words post from littledisciples account fetching over 80+ POB. But I didn’t feel I should be the judge of how relevant a writeup is for someone or how someone should use their upvote.
I can see that he has contributed for the initial growth and upbringing of the community. But this shouts irresponsibility which fends of community and potential investors. As this not something very hard to spot.
This isn’t difficult to reprimand either. He can easily follow any low staked manual curator. And switch at times. We even have POBleus team now to choose from. But i think as far as we should strech to neglect this is - an investor should at least be approachable to his peers if he can’t be responsible for any reasons.
If you ever become concerned about how something looks you can always follow onealpha's example. I feel he acts to protect his investment. However, we also don't have his stake in the game either. You do have a couple of options, though:
We have processes in place for this now, but no one person can evaluate every article. Even if we get all our earnings from doing so. Together, however, we can make in impact.
Oh, thanks for bringing this in my consideration. I will remember to share the link in discord if anything will seem offbeat to me.
Until now, I didn’t know over-rewarding is being moderated here. As this is something prevalent everywhere at the platform.
Well, that's the thing. Certain behaviors just aren't well-defined here and @trostparadox's recent proposal published for voting starts to address. Please don't forget to vote!