Sewing the seeds of our own destruction.
The Arab Spring with the help of the Obama administration managed to reach its goal of transplanting 10s of thousands of jihadees into Europe and making Europe accept them with open arms.
Sewing the seeds of our own destruction.
The Arab Spring with the help of the Obama administration managed to reach its goal of transplanting 10s of thousands of jihadees into Europe and making Europe accept them with open arms.
Another reason was that russians wanted to show themselves as aliens to european world after being kicked out of G7 and closed investments made their economy slow down.
And one more reason was to make europeans concentrate on refugees problems and let Russia continue war in Ukraine without any problems from UNO.
And after every terrorist attack in Europe russian authorities are coming out and say "we want a profound dialogue about terrorism", though in many cases russian roots can be almost obvious especially from Chechnya, which leader is a dog to Putin.
Interesting that you see it that way.
But in fact so called civil war in Syria is going on for six years already but millions of refugees overcrowded Europe not at the beginning of it. But when Russia being defeated in the eastern Ukraine decided to show their people some picture of excellent russian bombardiers.
Even it was widely spread in the news that Russians receive a good and cheap training in Syria (Asad is supposed to pay) - those were words of their president.
The Syrian civil war would have had a quick and bloody end and Assad would have been victorious. Right or wrong, it doesn't matter.
The Obama administration stuck their finger into the war, which it should not have done. It also stirred the pot in Egypt, which it should not have done. And, to make sure things really got going, it overthrew the Lybia government for no reason at all. Basically giving a reason for a "refugee emergency".
The majority of the "refugees" are fighting age men. These aren't refugees, they are either sleeper fighters, cowards or both.
It was stupid for Europe to accept any of them. The best thing to do would be to setup a section of the conflicted country as refugee territory and defend that until the refugees could go home or be probably assimilated into another country.
I live in a country with over 2 million refugees and lots of them are fighting age men, though we had time to be irritated about that fact.
But the war is about trust between soldiers and those person who are not ready or are not able to kill other people can be understood and can not be pushed to war. Two years after russian intervention and we have a contract army totally financed by our poor budget.
If it goes about syrians I understand that they suffer for us as well (for russians to be able to show their tanks and planes killing people - unfortunately russian authorities really think that's what is needed to be popular among their people). We have many syrian refugees as well but I know how they are treated in my country and I know that you hardly find any other more tolerate people than my nation.
And if it goes about people who are running from war it's totally understood that civil people should come out from bombs. That's what we are doing in Ukraine - the most hot spots were not living areas, the most prolonged fighting was over an airport (half a year we managed to drag terrorists to that spot).
It's easy to talk about war and what people should do when it's far away, but it's totally different when it's going on in your country.
That post directly above that I just put up explains how they are moving it all into Europe and doing exactly what you mention.