"The narcissism of small differences" ~~~FreudEveryone is a con-artist whose primary mark is self, one may never tell ones self that ones true story is false.Thinking that either of the candidates put forth by the ruling Elite (Inner Party), are going to fundamentally change anything is the true travesty in my opinion. The problems that the world faces cannot be broken down into two minutes segments and sound bites for the alleged informed consumer. Sadly Madison Avenue has turned the American people into consumers of trinkets. The propaganda Titans have created a culture and Ethos of supposedly informed consumers. The two candidates are little more than two opposing brands put forth by the (neo-Bourgeoisie). Both brands represent the policies of the oligarchic Inner Party, the true governing body of the world.Something else that I find troubling is the fervor at which proles support their candidates, it reminds me of football fans, rooting for their favorite team and player. The lust and emotion the fans put forth for their candidate or team is all emotionally driven, and emotionally driven decisions are usually the wrong decisions in my opinion.As long as the people do not understand how Financial systems truly work, the ramifications of energy or resource extraction on downward-slope, and any insight on how that affects geopolitics, the people will continue to be woefully ignorant of the true goings-on in the world. As they do not possess the real insights to process the news articles and information that are coming to light.As for the Marxist disciplinary dogma, because one speaks in the rhetoric of the edifice of state controlled systems and alleged capitalism, does not make one a Marxist. To hamper the discourse with superficiality is one of the primary objectives of the neoconservative and neoliberal movements, in my view.On the subject of the said, con-artists, please see the quote below, from the nephew of Freud, one proponent of arguably the most successful framework for con-artistry in the history."If he were a propagandist, on the other hand, although he would still use the radio, he would use it as one instrument of a well-planned strategy. Since he is campaigning on the issue of a low tariff, he not merely would tell people that the high tariff increases the cost of the things they buy, but would create circumstances which would make his contention dramatic and self-evident."~~~Propaganda Edward Bernays page 106wikispooks.com/w/images/1/1f/Propaganda.pdfTo see what could be obfuscated in plain sight and logicaly flawed. Please let me change the quote below into a more current derivative.If he were a propagandist, on the other hand, although he would still use the so called alternative media and mainstream media, he would use it as one instrument of a well-planned strategy. Since he is campaigning on the issue of a low tariff, he not merely would tell people that high taxes increase the cost of the things they buy, but would create circumstances and leaked emails published on wikileaks to make his contention dramatic and self-evident.
Hillary Clinton: I'm SO With Her! from David Seaman on Vimeo.
Hi! I am a content-detection robot. I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/which-would-be-better-economist-cover
I wrote the content myself. It can also be found at the link below.