Your images didn't come through, but there is one I can see in the article with a flag of Israel. That would refer to not only Israel but AIPAC / Israeli lobby in the US - it is not an image that points the finger at all Jews. I don't have an issue with people blaming Jews provided they can back up their arguments with evidence, but I didn't think the author of the article is doing that in the way you imply (unless of course you equate Zionists with Jews).
From my understanding, Israel wants to foment instability in the region in order to have chaos and weak states that can't threaten it, the Arab nationalist leaders are the ones they have a problem with and want to get rid of. Read this excerpt from https://disquietreservations.blogspot.de/2015/11/genocidal-us-and-israeli-leaders-want.html
Quoting:
In her article, entitled “Israel Backs Limited Strike Against Syria,” Rudoren noted that the Israelis were arguing, quietly, that the best outcome for Syria’s (then) 2 ½-year-old civil war, at least for the moment, was no outcome:
“For Jerusalem, the status quo, horrific as it may be from a humanitarian perspective, seems preferable to either a victory by Mr. Assad’s government and his Iranian backers or a strengthening of rebel groups, increasingly dominated by Sunni jihadis.
“‘This is a playoff situation in which you need both teams to lose, but at least you don’t want one to win — we’ll settle for a tie,’ said Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli consul general in New York. ‘Let them both bleed, hemorrhage to death: that’s the strategic thinking here. As long as this lingers, there’s no real threat from Syria.’”
I'm not entirely understanding what your point is in regards to these quotes. I'm not trying to be rude, it just makes sense to me that if you have to groups of people who both want to see you destroyed, but for the time being are warring with each other, isn't that a pretty sane position to hold to? Like if you had two people that wanted to kill you but for some reason they got into a fight with each other wouldn't your hope be that neither of them would win and be strengthened to come after you...Be honest, wouldn't you kinda quietly hope they just took each other out?
As for Zionism, I don't really understand what everybody's problem is with it. Palestine didn't even exist until 1988, long after the reformation of Israel. Why does it upset people so much that the Jews want a place to call their own? A place mind you that historically has been theirs for about 4000 years...The speck of dust in the middle of desert. Why can't they just have it?
And it's no wonder they desire a place to call their own. Everywhere else they go they get blamed for all the problems of the world...
Why the big need to shift the blame from the individuals running around cutting people's heads off with blunt knives anyway, or for that matter the books that teach them to do so. I'm so sick of people trying to avoid the fact that ISLAM is the real issue here, as much as others may take advantage of it's barbaric teachings to play war-games, if the ideology didn't exist, you wouldn't be able to use the poor brainwashed souls who adhere to it as the pawns and cannon fodder they have been reduced to.
Well this is a very big topic and not one that's going to be solved on this little speck of the internet, but I think you'll find zionist interests have far more control over America and the world generally than muslims do. And Jews aren't always the victims we're lead to believe. In fact, quite the contrary. There's a book by Yuri Slezkine called 'The Jewish Century', being the 20th century.
Old news now, but another article you might want to look at:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-23/secret-pentagon-report-reveals-us-created-isis-tool-overthrow-syrias-president-assad