Will vote for this proposal, for the following reasons:
You fix mistakes that are made and you give people a chance, not only with people "helping to explain things" but also with the people involved actually going out and doing homework and gathering all the relevant information.
Without any "emotions".
You know my personal dislike of how the 'downvoting' has been used/abused by many people who wish to use that for 'personal expression' and not as a tool for the good of the ecosystem/economy.
But the teams of people and in many cases individuals doing all the hard work on their own, imo $1,600 a year is not much, considering all the hours of work and effort put in.
Can't compare it to any commercial service out there.
Who out there is willing to work for free and get blasted for doing the right thing (trying to do the right thing) and having better results than any of the so called self proclaimed "policing forces" out there.
So covering costs involved in maintaining this valuable service to the ecosystem is the bare minimum as the labour hours are not accounted for, when it comes to the hard work involved.
Much more service provided than what stinc ever provided as far as the community and ecosystem go.
&
adding to all this, is the fact that the team there never judged new platforms, only those who literally were out to 'spam' the chain in various ways with all sorts of creative means.
So yeah, that pretty much covers why I am voting for this proposal, even if my vote won't make much of a difference in the grand picture.
Cheers.
Thank you for the feedback. Much appreciated. I know it's a tough sell to you so if you see the value then we must be doing something right.