I bought into the game as the concept is good but I can't support this proposal in its current form.
I don't believe in heavily funding any project that has not gotten itself operational first as there is no reason to believe that pumping money into a project will do any good when they have not managed to build a working concept by themselves first.
I would be happy to support an expansion of the work once we see a working model that needs more resources and I like the plan behind creating more accounts and bridging chains which would be worth funding.
3m for creating accounts is madness in my opinion as they can be created for free with resource credits or as part of the buy in for new players like splinterlands have with their spellbook.
Crypto has too many failed promises for me to support giving away money to a project that hasn't shown us anything other than a couple of promos.
I love the concept and like many others have bought assets in advance which should provide the funds to get the game off the ground but there needs to be more to ask for this kind of money from the community.
Also the team is looking for money to power up hive if I'm reading that right? Surely the project should be buying up hive from their sales to run the game. That is the whole point of the hive system to me. Projects power up funds to run their projects and provide the resources for their users. This is how they support the system.
I need to see more from the team and more development. I am hoping that it's a massive success and that you can get help from the community when the time is right but it's not there yet for me.
I believe this is not a proposal itself, just asking for support, and also think that is why why they will broken down into several different ones. Can show proof of pudding as work gets done and things are accounted for. Bridging the chains will be a huge feature!
Couldn't agree more. This is a preliminary announcement of proposals, not one large proposal itself.
The nice thing about having this list of proposals in the open is that it gives people like @niallon11 exactly what he's asking for, in my opinion, while he's asking for it. This is a marketing plan in the form of, "Let's show you what we're planning" and "We'll be asking for your help for these things very soon."
That's much different than submitting one proposal, getting it funded, fulfilling the project, then asking for another, and another, and another...instead, this is more like a roadmap and I am so grateful for @psyberx laying it out there in true transparency of their intentions moving forward. There's nothing hidden here that I can see and look forward to seeing the proposals so I can vote on them individually. I like the plan, guys! Keep it coming!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
!LUV
i agree sounds unsustainable.
But that was also a reason I dumped my tokens (1M).
After I ask " why not sell starter packs with some level tokens for constant demand" I got some weird answers.
It doesn't mean idea is bad, but looks to me "sell tokens" "sell NFT" "start proposal" and so on.
Remember Dlive?
yup.