I recently did a post where I looked at the percentage of the reward fund that some users are taking. Bernie you are at 0.2% of the reward fund!! And Haejin is at 2.133%
Anyways I do not think Haejin knows what the definition of a psychopath is (sociopath = psychopath) and even then, you don't exactly get diagnosed as a psychopath or a sociopath.... I mean maybe a psychologist could tell you more as my psychology knowledge comes from an introduction class and psych 260 (which was abnormal psychology i.e. study of psychological disorders)
Anyways I am digressing, point is that those whom argue that you are also taking a lot from the reward pool can be sent that post which will show just how far apart you and haejin are.
2.133%?! You guys are doing good work to try to nip it before this becomes a widespread problem. It would only take a few more "haejins" to make this platform unusable.
The berniesanders account is at 0.2% of the reward pool... Many of his accounts have no active author rewards. Considering I don't know all of bernies accounts (I doubt you do because he has way more than just the 17 he upvotes with consistently, I just don't know for sure about all of them)
But if you want to go and create a list of all suspected bernie accounts and list the cumulative rewards, then gladly do so.
As well, most of his accounts have no author rewards. I am excluding curation rewards because they can easily be misinterpreted. For instance Haejin collects higher curation rewards than Bernie but his curation rewards that he collects is almost exclusively from his own posts and its really difficult to convey where he will collect those curation rewards from if you don't exactly understand how the blockchain works. But looking at the curation rewards of all of bernies accounts, Idk.
So yes you are correct that the amount made is different than presented... It is however a lot more difficult to convey this information in a way that is easily digestible.