Hi @rhoty. That's interesting. I think the theory with the IQ test for statistically better employees is that there's a higher likelihood that they can learn and adapt to things they don't know; something you're often confronted with in a workplace. There's definitely however a need for a skillset suitable as a foundation though as you say.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree. On the other hand, with IQ, the problem is, if you are on totally high level in some category of IQ your adaptability si worse than the average, and sometimes worse than people below average, because simplicity could be problem - it is similair bot the same as autism/asperger problems. From my experience, if you could find some tme and read something about me (I ll be pleased) my communication - verbal/nonverbal IQ is at 136 from my last test 2 years ago. In fact I know how to communicate with people on different levels, different age or according to topics from football, sports, to science, technologies or books etc... but I experience moments when I am out of some communication with people because it is not about I am not able to understand, but my thinking process according to some communication makes me that I dont want to and it is barrier which can someone cause more "problem" "issues" than for people who are below average and they are not able to understand.