Hello!
In order to prevent identity theft, identity deception of all types, and content theft we like to encourage users that have an online identity, post for a website or blog, are creators of art and celebrities of all notoriety to verify themselves. Verified users tend to receive a better reception from the community.
Any reasonable verification method is accepted. Examples include:
- A post or tweet on an established Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or other social media account with a link to your contribution on Steemit.
- A reference or link to your Steemit account on your website or blog.
In order to confirm your authorship of the content. Please make a mention about Steemit or add a hyperlink to Steemit on your FB:
https://www.facebook.com/miss.brigitte.bauer
Or on your Twitter:
https://twitter.com/BrigitteCBauer
If we don't receive your confirmation within the next 24 hours, we will have to blacklist you for Identity Deception.
Thank you,
More Info: Introducing Identity/Content Verification Reporting & Lookup
Steemit has become inundated with paranoia equivalent to the idiocy of the US media in their collective efforts to perpetuate the Cold War 2.0. The platform is dominated by pedantic moron bots which seek to undermine creativity by enforcing all kinds of moronic rules and policies.
Here you go dummies: https://www.facebook.com/miss.brigitte.bauer
and: https://twitter.com/BrigitteCBauer
Do you need screen-shots of the actual links and posts referencing Steemit? Should I hold your hand too?
Happy now? Maybe instead of these stupid verification rules you should work on this shitty design of the platform which still looks like AOL before the Time Warner Takeover!
Thank You for confirming your authorship.
Your very welcome Robbie The Robot. No more Danger Danger Will Robisnon.....
Steemcleaners asked you for routine ID verification after you have been caught plagiarizing content on many posts. You have posted these posts as your own work. Steemit does not does not support and rewards plagiarizm.
Steemcleaners/Cheetah commented on your plagiarized content many times with warnings but you have completely ignored them and kept plagiarizing. On some of our warnings, you responded with aggressive comments.
You plagiarize whole paragraphs from different sources, then mix them up and post article as your own written work without giving sources.
On some other posts you give general sources to books, while it is still copypasta of paragraphs without nothing original added to content.
You have been on the platform for long enough to understand that such behaviour is frowned upon by Steemit community.
Here are examples of some of the articles that you have plagiarized:
https://steemit.com/psychology/@fugetaboutit/mindwar-the-concept-of-psychological-warfare-modern-origins
https://steemit.com/science/@fugetaboutit/strategic-communication-and-war-the-us-efforts-in-contemporary-propaganda-operations
https://steemit.com/science/@fugetaboutit/psychological-warfare-the-mindwar-mw-concept-and-application
https://steemit.com/education/@fugetaboutit/the-two-types-of-intellectuals-academia-defined
I get it spam bot content police. Stop being a pest with your silly reminders. You have ZERO interest in my content which covers a diversity of academic subjects of interest. You simply spam cut and paste responses reiterating pedantic policies in an effort to police this platform. You are undermining the seriousness of the subjects by posting spam and text which interferes with the presentation of these topics. If you had any true use you would spend more time on development and improvements to the design which sucks. It is something a child learning basic HTML would create. This is not AOL anymore. Even a cheap free Wordpress template would be an improvement.
As for your links you posted. The last one is MY OWN article posted on my own domain. It was simply utilized here as the theme was in concert with my subject matter.
Second you exaggerate. Those links all contain references as separate biblio or within the actual content matter which I allude to in my research. I think the general audience and user base from my small and selective readership is intelligent enough to discern. Try reading the articles instead of contributing to the useless automation we are already accustomed to in real time.
always remember that your SC messages have more than one audience and must be crafted to meet essential policy aims simultaneously.its impossible, when you must secure domestic support in proxy wars all over the world, but still insisting on being
good boy, fighting the world villains and defending our freedoms.they did made a choice, and decided to target their own audience. doesnt really matter how it sounds to the rest of the world. everyone is ready to forgive if you sanction my neighbor, give me independent state or fight for my biblical rights..
edit> i dont want to politize the subject, just saying its maybe not the best example.
p.s.
seriously, i expected to find some original thoughts on strategic communication in so much of comments ive seen in preview.
i guess when you have no opinion or knowledge about anything, being a cop and sticking up to your
rulesis the only option.