Sort:  

she defends freedom and natural values from a more moral or ethical point of view, nevertheless, I think that von Mises is the ultimate defender of freedom from the point of economic vitae just as Locke is to the political.

This post recieved an upvote from minnowpond. If you would like to recieve upvotes from minnowpond on all your posts, simply FOLLOW @minnowpond

Congratulations @rip-youtube! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You got your First payout
Award for the number of comments

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

Good to see you're informing a few Steemians on an important piece of the "understanding-the-real-world" puzzle. That it is often a "love Rand or hate Rand" reaction proves that emotions have been serving as the judges of Rand's contributions. That is silly, because when one THINKS rationally about that; emotions serve best as motivators - think of the motor in a locomotive - but emotions should never be used to steer a moving vehicle on the highway of our lives. Rational thought, logical thinking is the only way to fly, or steer.

Great comment. Thank you.