btw,
90% of the authors we remember as active participants today may not be in the next couple years
So you think mass adoption is going to happen?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
btw,
90% of the authors we remember as active participants today may not be in the next couple years
So you think mass adoption is going to happen?
Even if it doesn't that statement could still be true :P
i agree with that, stake holders change, power moves, people buy and sell, some leave some come...
Talking about DVs, lets be honest proof of brain concept still haven’t achieved, trending articles don’t seem persuading enough for the investors that got downvoted, that’s why they don’t aggree, they still make (maybe average) posts, the reason is of course being a lot of SP held by individuals aren’t used for real curation yet. But I can’t say I’m totally agreed with ocd current curation strategy either. Curators are human, I hope over time they get better and more professional.
Good luck
What exactly do you disagree with OCD's curation?
oh.. after checking ocd voting chart from the last 14 days, I figured my impression was a bit outdated maybe, as I still remember seeing ocd curators taking over the top 30 payout ranking right after HF21/22. Sure curators make a lot of efforts their work deserve some support, but it wasn't sustainable just by rewarding them with steem payout imho. But seems gets better when I look at the chart now. (sorry for the late reply btw)