I've seen some people say flagging is 'abuse', but it's just a form of curation. We should use it when we consider it appropriate.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I've seen some people say flagging is 'abuse', but it's just a form of curation. We should use it when we consider it appropriate.
You know, I've never been a fan of any type of centralized body that judges others.
Hence why I never really was a fan of all those groups that make judgement calls upon what is or isn't "quality as per their opinions".
However, when looking at all the little vigilante groups popping up who claim that their sh#1 doesn't stink and who are out there doing sh#t without actually looking into anything at all or curating as per the definition of curation, then man, I swear, it seems like we need a police force to police the police force and then another internal body to ensure that that police force is doing its job right too.
Damn, looks like humans have managed to make a real world scenario here too!
Well if nobody does anything then the abuse will just get worse. Those who flag it risk retaliation, so incentives can help. I do it because I believe in what Steem can be and I d fully like to see people exploit it whilst adding no value and giving nothing back. It's going to be interesting to see if Steem can scale up without turning to sh*t