Many advanced girls and women, criticizing the underdeveloped young men and men, sometimes resort to scientific evidence of their own rightness and alien underdevelopment.
For example, they say that there is a Maslow pyramid, based on primitive physiological needs, and crowned by its high spirituality and the need for self-expression. And if you climb to it with all sorts of desperate desires, then this proves that you have not gone far from the monkey. Say, to look for a way to the woman's heart is necessary not from below, but from above, through creativity, respect, recognition, etc.
In my opinion, this is absolutely unscientific stupidity.
No, I do not reject the Maslow pyramid as such, I just want to remind you that it visualizes something completely different, and not what you really want to attribute to it.
According to Maslow, you can rise in your development by overcoming consistently level after level. That is, first - physiological needs, then - security and protection, then - belonging to the social group, support and then - on the list.
So, from this it follows in black and white: if you, elementary, do not feed and water a person, then you will not have to talk about anything with him, because he will think in terms of an empty stomach. But when he is full, shod, dressed, warmed, when he feels the roof over his head, he is confident in the thickness of the walls and the fortress of the doors, then you can already talk with him about souls, about poetry, about avant-garde post-realism.
But, dammit, sex - it's also a BASIC need, pure physiology!
So why are you, denying a man in an intimacy, accuse him of not thinking about it - not about Picasso, Fellini and Schopenhauer, but about how to fill you up and put you in prison?
"Feed" it, and only after that demand more!
