In Marx's statement, there is a hidden assumption that nations are defined units with language and religion.
Picture
However, from a democratic nationalism point of view, it can and should be: It rejects the nations and nationalisms that define the nation with a language, a religion, a history, and fights against them, with a language, a religion, a history. nations that refuse to define, and define against such definition may be free.
Picture
If Marx were a democratic nationalist, that is, if the nation and the state defended blindness in the face of languages, religions, histories, and defended a nationalism that defended the absence of a language, religion, and history of the state, the formula would have been like this.
Sponsored ( Powered by dclick )
Use Steem on your mobile devices with Partiko
The best mobile application for Steem that's free to...
Congratulations @liyaparrish! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!