Thanks for telling me what my post is about Hartnell, I'm sure I'm just too God damned dumb to offer up an easily clear and concise premise!
The context of this post is unprovable religious claims about metaphysics offered up by most religionists as if the claims were just a matter of fact.....
Is there something difficult about understanding that? By all means, if you want to talk about other aspects of religion go right ahead, but I'd prefer to stay on topic on this particular thread...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: