Interesting perspective, enjoyed reading your post.
I won't call any of this scientific though. There's no empirical basis to your arguments. For example, thermodynamics are related to heat and temperature, not sins and resurrections. I understand I may come off as pedantic about semantics, but the point is - scientific study done on an empirical basis simply does not apply to theological or philosophical quandaries.
All that said, it does make for interesting analogies. :) I welcome them as thought experiments.
Personally, I don't think it's possible to reconcile science with Christianity.
I plan to develop this in more detail next week... look forward to you feedback on the "though experiments" then.
I Don't Have Enough Faith To Be An Atheist is a very interesting read. Hope that is helpful for your further postsOne of the biggest issues that people need to decide on is whether the bible is fact, fiction, or a bit of both. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeneutics (obviously not a reliable source, but a brief overview of what it is). Regardless of the stance and position you believe in, the book
Does the Teleological argument prove the existence of God@liberosist and @gavvet, I wanted to comment, but then the comment became too long for the comment section. Please have a look at my argument in the post
Well that's a much nicer way than I put it.