Perhaps we should task the curators with increasing their diligence while curating?
Instead of voting it mostly to those that drop it like it is hot, those curators could cultivate the authors that do other things outside of blogging traveling food posts that helps bring attention to us?
Rather than blindly voting rewards to people, perhaps relationships beyond 'me big vote, you lick boots speak corporate speak' could be developed?
Hivewatchers has been a source of friction all along.
It exists because curators can't be bothered with not voting rewards to scammers.
The anti-abuse community, few that we are, has had to chase behind the people complaining about dilution while voting rewards to people that dump all they get as quick as they get it.
Wtf?
Rather than being responsible curators, many curators expect hivewatchers and sundry volunteers to keep the mess tolerably cleaned up.
Scammers get more support than dissenters.
Dissenters at least make examinations of what is likely truth more plentiful.
Scammers are who are diluting the complainers.
I agree with what you say about rewards migrating to the 2nd layer, but I can't see that as a realistic occurrence before rc's have value.
Once rc's can be rented out the need to distribute the hive token can be dialed back.
People will move to the second layer because the first is more expensive to maintain a presence on.
Until then, it looks like we get what we got because that is how it is and nobody that could change it will change it, imo.
The adage is just as true now as ever, 'If you don't like how hive is being managed, buy more hive.'
Curating is a job. It's often thankless work, and the reward isn't great. Until someone can feed a family and live off curation rewards, I very much doubt we'll have a chance at the professionalism you seek.
I'm not sure how one begets the other. But assuming it does, if RC's become much more valuable, that means we've grown massively. But if we've grown massively, then content moderation is even more complex. Decentralizing to L2 allows for competing approaches of tackling the problems that arise.
Yeah scammers are STILL a big problem
Have never thought about scammers being more profitable than dissenters, but you are probably right
I have also been expelled from the German community
They rather just agree with each other and vote this instead of overcoming their bias
They think they are right and even successful
Sadly they will loose everything, it will be harder the more they cling
And denied truth and common sense before
Control freaks gotta control.™
!lol, that is hilarious.
Germany has laws against professing fascism, but clearly that is the preferred technique to dealing with their problems.
'Do it, or you are out!'
Lmao.
lolztoken.com
He lost interest.
Credit: lofone
@woelfchen, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of antisocialist
(1/4)
NEW: Join LOLZ's Daily Earn and Burn Contest and win $LOLZ