I'm with you on this.
I think that the reward pool should be allocated as staking rewards instead of content rewards.
Provide easy to launch communities, apps and tokens with a good secondary market for them and let each community moderate their own token, content and rewards.
If people want more hive they trade their leo, spt or whatever secondary token they get rewarded in.
People can support the eco-system by powering up hive and getting rewarded passively without the need for voting trials, downvotes, infighting over quality content.
This does not make any logical sense because if the communities control the abuse like they should then there will be no problem on Hive. If we are saying we are going to see more AI abuse on hive in the future then this is changing nothing because rewards are still coming through from the community token. There has to be a better alternative as relying on communities for rewards is not the best as we have seen how that has worked in the past. 90% of communities have been milked dry and they hold no value. I see very little positives in this and you know me I am all behind Hive doing well.
Exactly my thoughts, thanks.
This is stupid, sorry. It does not make any sense at all.
If all would just stake and not engage, this platform would be dead. It would be just one more DeFi platform.