I think it's debatable who is more wasteful. I think the poor are generally more wasteful since a lot of them don't work and are supported by the rich.
It seems like almost every poor person I know is broke but almost all of them have tattoos and a lot of them do drugs and smoke and play the lottery.
There is a cycle though. I think we need to get more poor people to buy houses instead of paying rent.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Or, we could keep working, but stop paying and shame them into getting jobs.
Generally when true anarchy happens people don't worry about others and focus only on their survival.
Why can't we shame people now? There are poor people in the USA and jobs available.
Jebus, here we go, AGAIN!
Learn what anarchism is before slandering it, eh?
You have no clue.
Your indoctrination has you believing lies.
Anarchy is order.
Its why we circle the A.
Your thought controllers told you anarchy is chaos, but that is false.
It is in their interests to keep you from knowing the truth.
I'm going by the real definition and not the dream world broke hippy commune.
I think wealth does help create a need for more order since there are envious people in this world.
Oh shit, now you got me cussin'.
No, you are going by the newspeak definition because you embrace your slavery.
You are a dupe, and you love it.
Its ok, we only need 3% of the population to change the paradigm, you can be on the wrong side of that as long as you like.
:) lol
Anarchy = no government. Even those broke hippies quasi had a government but it's easier when everyone is broke to have "anarchy".
Money isnt happiness.