Hi everyone. Loving, loving, loving steemit and all you do. I am about to start sharing your white paper with friends in order to demonstrate the future of what a social media platform needs to be. We are the future!
I personally would like to see a solution to down- voting. I recently down voted a post (because it simply sucked and I later provided honest and hopefully helpful feedback) but they took it personally because they appeared to be afraid it was going to affect their steemit wallet.
Maybe that is their issue and they aren't a good fit for the platform, but the issue I honestly see is being able to provide feedback without totally impacting somebody's account value.
Maybe a middle path, or other besides a simply up or down vote?
Mahalo and Aloha!
@rsbosse you don't have to vote on a post to get someone's attention. You can reply to the post to provide feedback and specifically say that is the reason you are not voting for the post and others shouldn't as well.
I understand. For sure. Thank you. I guess it leaves me asking the question though if you see folks coming on the platform and purposely trying to infiltrate it with political content or controversial politics? For example, if someone comes on here with white nationalist content, or even blatant KKK stuff, am I supposed to simply comment or is it wiser to down vote?