Well, curating wisely is something you do for the community, so why not making a post about it?
Also, I included the "only autovote once a day" clause, which means that at least 90% of the Steem power delegated will go to other users who deserve it :D Perhaps you missed the part about not autovoting.
Oh, autovoting is self-voting on a created post. Thanks for the clarification, that makes sense. I read it, just thought it had to do with bots or something. I don't think I qualify as I haven't been active in any discussion groups nor have I had enough time in the community to be able to make an educated decision on which witnesses I would vote for. And at most I would try to help foster the charity-focused aspect of the community, encourage new international members from less well-off nations, and create one self-voted post a day that would have the sum be delegated to whatever charitable account the people wanted it to be delegated to (by raw vote count, not $). Actually, thanks for making me think some more on what my ultimate goals with this account really are, lol.
Of the comments I have seen on this post, I do believe I agree with this one the most. I absolutely love your idea for spreading rewards to more users, and selecting a particularly good curator would likely spread rewards a little further. I would like to nominate myself for your delegation reward. I have not done a post myself, but two other people have nominated me because of my contests designed to spread rewards. They are linked in the comment that I left, and in comments from @artaddict and @positivity420. I also wanted to bring this post to your attention. POST LINKED HERE! That post is an interview that I did with @ethandsmith discussing my contests, what I do, and what I hope to accomplish here on Steemit. Like I said, I really like this initiative, and hope that you consider me!