This was all new to me. I read the original article from @michaelx and your response to it but I don't see your reasoning behind being so against it. Is it because you don't like marketing? What is it about @michaelx ' s idea that is so "scammy" / wrong to you?
As @xeroc mentioned, you have to be really careful when you make accusations against people. You need to back up your words with evidence or substance for readers to understand why you are calling something a "scam."
Agree. Danka.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, just as everyone is entitled to vote. If you are aggressive for no reason simply because I asked a question, then I will surely downvote you.
More evidence and less emotion would be helpful here. I'm also passionate about protecting the brand because I think there's a cool thing being started here. To me, the way you're approaching this situation doesn't seem like an adult having an adult conversation. Someone asked you a specific question and you replied with censorship, emotional outbursts (from my perspective), etc. I think your case would be better served via reasoned dialogue. If you've moved on already, then I guess that's fine, and you won't have to worry about the brand anymore.
Ouch. I didn't attack you at all, I just asked for clarification and gave an opinion on how to be careful with your words. But then you respond with:
Downvoting for unneeded aggression and ill-will =(