Thanks for mentioning Esteem app. Kindly join our Discord or Telegram channels to learn more about Esteem, don't miss our amazing updates. Follow @esteemapp as well!
Thank you for the clarification. I don't think that if expensive lending automatically means scam. Maybe you pay extra for ease of use or instant delivery.
I apologize for the lack of updates regarding the matter back as I had other things that needed my attention. It was entirely my fault.
I did not know that someone that is more experienced in this have been working on it until lately, as I have not been keeping up with the proposals in the last few months until I saw the teaser in the trending page.
Please could you avoid speaking the truth and calling out people this is not how we work here on hive so please keep truth speaking to your centralised steem where you wont get any downvotes and be visible. Thank you
I know I shouldn't reply to this ridiculous post, but for any readers who may not know, I should address how the following is completely incorrect (as is likely most everything else in this post).
@yabapmatt, the creator of @steemmonsters and the most used bid-bot software, as also been slowly syphoning and will keep on syphoning 200 HBD/day for keychain, a software that barely got updated in the past year. And apparently @stoodkev is the one doing most of the work.
The currently running proposal was receiving 100 HBD/day (and is currently not funded). You can clearly see on chain that I have taken zero of that. It has all gone to @stoodkev, who is doing the vast majority of the work (probably the only thing you got correct here). Additionally, it's very easy to check the github repo to see exactly how much work has been done over the past year.
The original proposal on Steem paid out to the @steem-keychain account and the new, upcoming proposal on Hive will pay out to the @keychain account. Never have they paid out to me directly. It also doesn't pay out to @stoodkev directly because we don't know for sure that he will always be doing all of the work. In the future there may be other developers (or designers, etc.) working on the project that will receive payments, so that's why the proposal pays out to an account set up specifically for this project and then funds can be transparently distributed from there.
How do you defend against storing @steemmonsters accounts server-side and never giving the keys to the users? Don't you think it's a bit abuse?
This statement is also incorrect. Users can retrieve the keys to their account created through the Splinterlands game website after they have purchased the Summoner's Spellbook (previously known as the Starter Set) which costs $10 and provides many other benefits in the game beyond just getting account keys. At that point, they may change their keys if they do not want us to have access to them.
We are working hard to bring in non-crypto users to the game and most of them are just not capable of securely storing keys and not losing them, so it's absolutely essential that we do that for them. Anyone who is capable of that can request and change their keys, or make an account through any other method and use that to log into the game.
The problem with voting up the return proposal is that it makes it even less likely valuable proposals like the Peakd development will get funded. It's inconceivable that it isn't funded and some of this other stuff is.
The first part of the post is mostly nonsense if im being completely honest.
Ill upvote it though because we really need folks to make a breakdown of the work these devs are doing/ or are pretending to do.
Now, youre obviously not the person to do so since youre hardly trustworthy and obviously hold a grudge but it is still interesting to hear a dev comment on these things and it might encourage other devs with better reputations to jump on this.
Now, i can say without a doubt that Justine getting paid 30k USD is fucking insanity and probably the biggest injustice on Hive thus far and i can also raise the concern that Netouso and the other guys might be twiddling with their dicks most of the day since we lack a control mechanism that will protect the chain from inefficient use of funds... but i cannot make a judgement of their work on a consistent basis since i lack the technical expertise.
Thats why we need folks to come out and audit their work.
Since day 1 ive held that the proposal system should be used only for funding singular tasks. You propose what you will do and ask funding for it. Once its completed you move on to another task.
I cant agree with that assessment at this time. I say we give it a year. After that year is up, if the majority of funded proposals are coming from the same 10-20 people and no new devs are funded then we can say without a doubt that the Proposal system is a huge waste of time and resources..
Why don't you clone your posts on to Steem? It's only three copy & paste pairs. For now, I get more on Hive for my posts on Hive than on Steem.
It seems a million dollars a year for a coin with a marketcap of 6 million is not going to hold its peg.
I sold all my Hive in the run up (well before the peak) before Bitcoin's price went back to normal. I should get rid of the HBD, also,
I made some changes to a copy of the Steem Condenser source. It does tend to crash from time to time, maybe the VPS I am running it on doesn't have enough RAM connected to it and I do not run it 24/7 because I haven't figured out how to run it headless.
The witnesses also vote in new rules and being large holders themselves in Hive, determine who new witnesses can be. It seems I am not on their bad-side for now but I have never earned good money posting or voting on Steem/Hive. My time is better spent working for fiat, like probably most people.
This is your sad, pathetic life.
+1 for drama.
This ^
Thanks for mentioning Esteem app. Kindly join our Discord or Telegram channels to learn more about Esteem, don't miss our amazing updates.
Follow @esteemapp as well!
Selling delegations and trading bots are scam - that's something new :)
Thank you for the clarification. I don't think that if expensive lending automatically means scam. Maybe you pay extra for ease of use or instant delivery.
As for burn posts, I'll take a closer look ;)
😂😭🤣😭😂😭🤣
Oh look. Truth hurts.
Hey @techcoderx, @heimindanger tells me you finished and opened sourced Ledger integration 8 months ago! Happy days!
When can we expect the application to be delivered?
(Just messing with you. @heimindanger is on drugs. And not the good kind)
I apologize for the lack of updates regarding the matter back as I had other things that needed my attention. It was entirely my fault.
I did not know that someone that is more experienced in this have been working on it until lately, as I have not been keeping up with the proposals in the last few months until I saw the teaser in the trending page.
Too much cannabis fucks up almost anyone.
Not really, I was just not keeping up with things, my mistake.
Please could you avoid speaking the truth and calling out people this is not how we work here on hive so please keep truth speaking to your centralised steem where you wont get any downvotes and be visible. Thank you
I know I shouldn't reply to this ridiculous post, but for any readers who may not know, I should address how the following is completely incorrect (as is likely most everything else in this post).
The currently running proposal was receiving 100 HBD/day (and is currently not funded). You can clearly see on chain that I have taken zero of that. It has all gone to @stoodkev, who is doing the vast majority of the work (probably the only thing you got correct here). Additionally, it's very easy to check the github repo to see exactly how much work has been done over the past year.
Get your facts straight, and then go away.
The original proposal on Steem paid out to the @steem-keychain account and the new, upcoming proposal on Hive will pay out to the @keychain account. Never have they paid out to me directly. It also doesn't pay out to @stoodkev directly because we don't know for sure that he will always be doing all of the work. In the future there may be other developers (or designers, etc.) working on the project that will receive payments, so that's why the proposal pays out to an account set up specifically for this project and then funds can be transparently distributed from there.
This statement is also incorrect. Users can retrieve the keys to their account created through the Splinterlands game website after they have purchased the Summoner's Spellbook (previously known as the Starter Set) which costs $10 and provides many other benefits in the game beyond just getting account keys. At that point, they may change their keys if they do not want us to have access to them.
We are working hard to bring in non-crypto users to the game and most of them are just not capable of securely storing keys and not losing them, so it's absolutely essential that we do that for them. Anyone who is capable of that can request and change their keys, or make an account through any other method and use that to log into the game.
They also get a starter pack, I think.
So basically they should run for free and educate users. The best business model to never make money or get a user base, inspired from Dtube!
Harsh comment for all the shit you say.
If you don't like what you see why don't you just create a new fork?
He already created his own @dtube chain
The problem with voting up the return proposal is that it makes it even less likely valuable proposals like the Peakd development will get funded. It's inconceivable that it isn't funded and some of this other stuff is.
The first part of the post is mostly nonsense if im being completely honest.
Ill upvote it though because we really need folks to make a breakdown of the work these devs are doing/ or are pretending to do.
Now, youre obviously not the person to do so since youre hardly trustworthy and obviously hold a grudge but it is still interesting to hear a dev comment on these things and it might encourage other devs with better reputations to jump on this.
Now, i can say without a doubt that Justine getting paid 30k USD is fucking insanity and probably the biggest injustice on Hive thus far and i can also raise the concern that Netouso and the other guys might be twiddling with their dicks most of the day since we lack a control mechanism that will protect the chain from inefficient use of funds... but i cannot make a judgement of their work on a consistent basis since i lack the technical expertise.
Thats why we need folks to come out and audit their work.
Since day 1 ive held that the proposal system should be used only for funding singular tasks. You propose what you will do and ask funding for it. Once its completed you move on to another task.
I cant agree with that assessment at this time. I say we give it a year. After that year is up, if the majority of funded proposals are coming from the same 10-20 people and no new devs are funded then we can say without a doubt that the Proposal system is a huge waste of time and resources..
lol sounds like socialism :)
Why don't you clone your posts on to Steem? It's only three copy & paste pairs. For now, I get more on Hive for my posts on Hive than on Steem.
It seems a million dollars a year for a coin with a marketcap of 6 million is not going to hold its peg.
I sold all my Hive in the run up (well before the peak) before Bitcoin's price went back to normal. I should get rid of the HBD, also,
I made some changes to a copy of the Steem Condenser source. It does tend to crash from time to time, maybe the VPS I am running it on doesn't have enough RAM connected to it and I do not run it 24/7 because I haven't figured out how to run it headless.
The witnesses also vote in new rules and being large holders themselves in Hive, determine who new witnesses can be. It seems I am not on their bad-side for now but I have never earned good money posting or voting on Steem/Hive. My time is better spent working for fiat, like probably most people.