You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Top 1.6% of Holders Own 90% of EOS Supply

in #scammasterdan7 years ago (edited)

Well, I've been here since day 1 and I know exactly how the launch of Steem went, who was involved, mining, etc. It was, well, interesting. Steem has it's distribution downfalls, but nowhere near the levels of EOS.

I think with EOS, we'll be learning a lot more about who these large holders are and why the ICO was structured the way it was. We'll be revisiting this soon.

If Steem had a community who would actually contribute to the codebase, rather than relying on STINC, it could go places.

As long as we're relying on a team of amateurs to improve Steem, we're screwed.

Sort:  

As long as we're relying on a team of amateurs to improve Steem, we're screwed.

I am willing to bet that Dan's steem killer dapp he wants to create is going to just end up with a bunch brand new equally bad problems! HA

I dont really think steem will be screwed though. At worst it will just be a solid social media dapps platform. Its not technically that hard to base a game on this blockchain. I have a couple people I know looking into it.

There is a lot of potential here even in a stagnant development cycle. Sometimes stagnant development cycles are a good thing as it allows for people to feel more secure in being creative.