There are 3 kinds of ICOs:
SCAMS
CRAP
LEGITIMATE
YOU CAN REDUCE THE RISK BY USING 3 FILTERS
- The project’s idea should make sense, but do not base your investment decision purely on the idea. Watch:
There are probably 10 other people with the same idea that you have or that the ICO has. The most important factor to success is the ability to execute.
HAS THE ICO TEAM BUILT ANYTHING THAT WE CAN USE TODAY?
If not, take a pass. This is the best evidence that the team can execute. It takes way more skill, time, work and money to build an app than to create a one-page website and video. It shows:
The team has proven that they can develop.
It is less likely that the team will invest so much and not follow through.
Everything else is useless. Don’t be fooled by big teams, fancy pretentious titles, references, roadmap, video, fancy animations, escrow, blogs, Slack, Telegram, Twitter, Facebook, Reddit and white paper.
One project stacked their team with a dozen people and then lied about them. One member had the title of “Blockchain Expert”, but he worked in Inside Sales until 1.5 months prior. One member had the title “Blockchain Developer”, but he never developed a blockchain before.
Here is an example of a project team using fake photos and fake names: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1949528.msg19485217#msg19485217
Don't rely on Github unless you can verify that they didn't copy the code from someone else and you can run it.
Several high profile projects raised millions of dollars and still have not produced an app. This number will grow and become more evident in the coming years.
Gnosis raised $12.5 million and their website says:
Quote
“The Hunch Game is nearly ready and can be launched in the first half of 2017 as an example Gnosis app.”
No app yet.
Qtum raised $15.6 million. I don't see anything produced on Qtum's website.
After raising $50 million, Cosmos's website is still pitching its white paper. Come on. What have they produced with that $50 million?
Augur had Vitalik Buterin on their team. After Satoshi Nakamoto, Vitalik is the most desirable person in the universe to have on an ICO team. After raising multiple millions and after two and a half years, all they’ve released is a simple beta that is barely usable.
Don’t be suckered by animations and videos. Satoshi didn’t have any of this and his coin was the most successful. Besides, the animations aren’t that impressive anymore, as I’m beginning to see the same animation on multiple websites. Some of these teams must be using the same graphic designer.
- IS THE TEAM FROM A CORRUPT COUNTRY?
If so, take a pass.
The number of ICOs from corrupt countries, especially those that were famous for sending out phishing scams for years, have exploded.
- “NEVER INVEST IN A BUSINESS THAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND”
Last word:
You need to be able to verify that the business problem exists, that the market size is truly as big as the ICO claims and that the solution is possible.
Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2243157.msg22704771
Congratulations @bgsux! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP