Good article, readable and succinct. I just love to use consilience in my arguments for evolution and other "theories". I'll be writing a post today or tomorrow on what we learned from the human genome project, part of it being that we verified what we already knew from morphological comparisons, but since the methods of DNA analysis and bone and morphology analysis really have nothing to do with one another, it's just basically incontrovertible proof. And these two aren't the only completely independent methodologies pointing to the exact same conclusions.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: