another point is.. why would anyone be taking acyclovir or val or gan or ganvalcyco without any medical condition related to herpes genre of viral family? good and informative post though.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
another point is.. why would anyone be taking acyclovir or val or gan or ganvalcyco without any medical condition related to herpes genre of viral family? good and informative post though.
thanks... sorry i forgot it to mention in the post, the patients did develop herpes infection thats why they took aciclovir ..but the herpes infection was most probably not the one to cause the symptomps (researchers did not mentioned it here- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151143/)
Got it. Just reviwed the original article. Next time a patient comes to you with nuhilistic attitude..you have one more differential diagnosis to think about now. Thanks. :-)
Yes.. :)