So.... you want to moderate what other people choose to vote on? Isn't that kind of against the spirit of Steemit given it's supposed to be a form of decentralized social media?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
So.... you want to moderate what other people choose to vote on? Isn't that kind of against the spirit of Steemit given it's supposed to be a form of decentralized social media?
No, I want to vote as well, based on my views of how rewards are being allocated. That's very much part of the spirit of Steemit. But I also have a view that for developers of the system to support pile-on voting and concentrate rewards on one post out of a thousand is unfortunate. Couldn't they at least find four different good posts to support instead of all piling on, or failing that simply step away and let the community votes have more influence? That, to me, is a lot more decentralized.
sadly there is so much to go around, we cant all get 1000 per day. at least unless the first 60 people do and then the rest get their other days to hope for :D