According to Smithsonian Magazine, "From hiccups to wisdom teeth, the evolution of man has left behind some glaring, yet innately human, imperfections." One of those imperfections is a question of probability.
In his desperately foolish attempt to deny God, Charles Darwin's theory of evolution contradicts itself.
Darwinism teaches natural selection, evolution's innate ability to pick out the strong genes and species for survival. Hence, we humans have evolved over billions of years, and we are (so far) the crowing glory of Mother Nature.
But hold on here...
I understand, according to Charles Darwin and his "science," that we humans occupy the top of the evolutionary ladder. That's why we're seven billion strong. But didn't we also evolve from monkeys and other primates?
So how come this perfect, unquestioned science of natural selection selected both the strong and the weak? In other words, why are monkeys and apes still around when we humans are their highly-evolved form?
Even more startling, where are the in-betweeners?
If monkeys and apes occupy the lowest rung of the evolutionary ladder, shouldn't we also see at least one of the various early man species walking the earth today? After all, are not these cave men the higher-evolved species of mere monkeys and apes?
While evolutionary science questions the existence of an Almighty Creator, they unhesitatingly accept the "fact" that natural selection selected the weak and strong species, and eliminated everything in the middle.
Wow
I think the same with you