Mathematics requires proof of claims or evidence. That is the very essence of mathematics. I saw only claims and nothing more.
Your reaction is also an example of what this post was talking about.
How, I would have responded was, "In what ways? Can you tell me more?"
I did respond that way. And I quote:
What indications exist that certain assumptions of mathematics are incorrect?
Even when I was amicable in my response asking you for any indication (which I meant to act as a synonym for evidence) that you had that the assumptions of math are false, you make a claim that my reaction is an example of what this post was about.
In short, I observed and stated that your claims were baseless and had no evidence. I asked for your sources and information, yet you sidestep the question.
I have some more questions that I am sure you will also choose to not answer.
- What's your definition of rational?
- What's your proof that Pi is a rational number?
- What sources do you have that ancient civilizations considered Pi to be rational in their form of mathematics?
- When's the next FES meeting?