There are many things worth considering in this post. As someone involved in academic research, I'm familiar with some of the sentiments you've described. One of my colleagues was told by one of his reviewers (after submitting a paper for publication) that he had "set back the field of thermodynamics by 100 years." Journal reviewers may often have conflicts of interest if a paper presents research that he or she is currently working on. There are many things to consider, but I would agree with the points you make here. As to the subscription costs, I published a blog about that exact subject last week. Thanks for sharing. This was well worth my time to read.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thanks for reading and sharing your insight! I just checked out your blog post but I'll comment about that there :)