I don't have a complete faith in science for example when they say a star is so many millions of light years away I really believe they are lying, or when they say something is so many hundreds of thousand years old, I believe they are lying there too, but I believe they lie just so they don't have to say I don't know.
On the other hand I do see many scientific advancements, in a lot of fields so even if they are communist they are getting some things done, wouldn't you think?
Or maybe I misunderstood what you are trying to convey.
Well science is supposed to be impartial. Science should be able to be done by anyone, no matter of beliefs or ideology, because the scientific method is a clear set of rules, that should be easy to go by.
But since humans are flawed, and view the world subjectively, their experiences and perceptions filter the information they get. So people will be less hesitant to accept evidence that goes against their belief, and will go for evidence that support their beliefs.
Which is false, and it's a violation of the scientific method. Scientists should not go for evidence that supports their conclusions, but rather find the conclusion from the evicence, impartially.
But humans are incapable of that, unless they understand philosophy.