You talked about 95.4% patient satisfaction, does it mean the procedure achieved the desired result almost 95 times out of 100? If this is the case, I would say it's still a significant success especially if the eye issue is a chronic one.
Even though I would have loved to see more statistical information concerning the procedure, you did a good job with the write-up. Well done.
Hello @gentleshaid
Yes it is a significant record I must confess but at the same time questionable when you consider this FDA observation:
But then the essence of this article is for people to ensure that they are adequately pre-screened to determine if they are suitable for the procedure. For instance, it can be very risky for a diabetic (who is liable to delay healing) to undergo the procedure.
Thanks for reading.
@eurogee