There is a lot of data in the primary article, and it's not presented in a humorous way. I just found it funny once I looked at the method section to see examples of what the complements were. So I wrote this post focusing more on that, rather than the data as much.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't remember having seen any joke if any scientific article I have read. The opposite would have been surprizing (I personally keep my jokes for the conferences :p)
;)