I will not answer you again, but check my answer here.
Your theory cannot cope with ALL the problems solved by the dark matter hypothesis. The only viable atlernative IMO consists of the MOND theories. Definitely not yours.
Now concerning crackpots in my field, they all have something in common: they all claim modern physics is a pseudoscience. That is not a good start. First, as modern physics works amazingly well (confronting predictions to all data from the microscopic world). Therefore, if you want to propose something else, you need to show your something else can do as good on all aspects. Stating that whatever is your theory, it is the truth and everything else (including a 100+ years old theory that is consistent up to now) is crackpottery sounds either very selfish to me. The other viable option being of course that you are not understanding a clue about modern physics...
In the end, it's very simple. There is no reason for formulating the dark matter hypothesis , other than that it's existence is inferred from gravitational effects as predicted by gravitational (space curving) theory. Therefore, there are only two possibilities:
And since the Biefeld-Brown effect clearly suggest a correlation between the Electric field and gravity, such as our proposal "gravity = grad E", which is NOT solved by the dark matter hypothesis, we can at the very least establish that our aetheric proposal confirms and quantifies a little known phenomena and it also explains why Martin Tajmar was unable to repeat Brown's results. All one needs to do is look at his capacitor/electrode configuration with the knowledge that gravity = grad E to realize that his configuration won't fly.
Furthermore, the experiments by David LaPoint with plasma under the influence of magnetic fields show very clearly that electromagnetic forces are the dominant forces all the way from the sub-atomic to galaxy scale.