Sir @apsu. I mentioned "most of the time" not 'all the time'. Like you I also believed that doing a peer review wrong in purpose can damage the peer reviewer.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sir @apsu. I mentioned "most of the time" not 'all the time'. Like you I also believed that doing a peer review wrong in purpose can damage the peer reviewer.
I didn't only focus on that and didn't mean all the time. But do you have any good ideas what could replace the peer reviewing?
Sadly, NONE. I think sir @apsu that peer reviewing is still the best. Although there are many issues like the bias and trust. I couldn't deny that in this time no other method can replace peer reviewing.