Planets bigger than stars!

in #science7 years ago (edited)

Alike.jpg

Star: An object in the sky that sends out its own light, generated by nuclear reactions in its center.

Planet: A celestial body moving in an elliptical orbit around a star.



Well that's the end of that. Clearly they're very different and my magnum opus is rendered obsolete.

Or is it?

Yes.






OR IS IT?

You see, although the Google results defining each object are pretty clear cut, and our preconceptions of what planets and stars are have been embedded into our beliefs, the line between planet and star can actually get pretty blurry sometimes - so much so that astrophysicists often get them completely mixed up. At least, when looking at them from *really* far away, anyway.

The thing is, we typically think of stars as huge, and planets as small. But nowhere in the definitions above mentions size or mass. And that's where things start to get complicated.

First, just out of interest, here's a list of planet types:

Binary planet, Carbon planet, Chthonian planet. Circumbinary planet. Coreless planet, Desert planet, Dwarf planet, Earth analog, Eccentric Jupiter, Exoplanet, Extragalactic planet, Gas giant, Helium planet, Hot Jupiter (pegasid), Hot Neptune, Ice giant, Ice planet, Inner planet, Iron planet, Lava planet, Mega-Earth, Mesoplanet, Mini-Neptune, Minor planet
Ocean planet, Outer planet, Plutoid, Protoplanet, Puffy planet, Pulsar planet, Rogue planet, Sub-brown dwarf, Sub-stellar object, Super-Earth, Super-Jupiter, Terrestrial planet, Trojan planet

Now a few of them stand out to me; Sub-brown dwarf, Sub-stellar object and Super-Jupiter. So let's investigate:

Failed Stars

A Brown dwarf is a small star, you might think. But it is actually defined as such:

A sub-stellar objects that occupy the mass range between the heaviest gas giant planets and the lightest stars

Another way its described is a 'failed star' because they are objects that often lack the mass to kick start fusion, and end up being a pointless blob in space, slowly oozing out its internal heat.

Their range, over four classes; M, L, T and Y brown dwarfs, is between 13 and 80 times the mass of Jupiter. Remember, mass and size are very different things. 13Mj, or Jupiter Masses is the minimum threshold needed for fusion to take place and can make the difference between a proper, burning star and a pile of rubble. But there's no hard rule as to the size of these objects.

Jupiter, for example, is only about 10 times smaller than our Sun, but its volume is 1,000 times less and thus the Sun's mass is 1.989 × 10^30 kg, compared to Jupiter at a pathetic 1.898 × 10^27 kg. Needless to say, our Sun is a whole lot more massive than Jupiter and any brown dwarves out there.

So brown dwarves, sub-stellar objects, super Jupiters or whatever you want to call them are not that impressive. A sub-brown dwarf is the same thing as a brown dwarf but even less interesting. Where brown dwarfs can fuse their natural abundance of heavy Hydrogen (Deuterium), sub-browns are below that 13Mj minimum, so no fusion can happen at all, and they are typically described instead as free-floating planets or planetary-mass brown dwarfs.

So even though brown dwarfs are often stars, they're also often not stars, and we're already blurring the lines between what we call a planet and what we call a star.

However.

The Cutest Star

In July this year, it was announced that the star EBLM J0555–57Ab, or BLAb, as I'm going to call it, has a mass 85 times that of Jupiter. However, its size is only 84% of Jupiter; almost exactly the same size as Saturn! This means in a quite literal sense, there are planets out there bigger than stars. BLAb is not a brown dwarf, since it is significantly over the mass threshold where fusion can kick start, it's simply way denser than Jupiter and other gas giants.

The Difference

So when all is said and done, there are planets bigger than stars, but there are also planets almost as massive as stars too. The largest Super Jupiters are defined as anything up to 80 times the mass of Jupiter - ie...A brown dwarf? Well, in any case, 13Mj is enough to create fusion, 12Mj is not. That's the entire difference between a star and a planet. Even though some planets that aren't stars could be 80Mj the mass, but just way bigger. Huh?

These mixed definitions are why Astronomers often confuse stars with planets, because Brown Dwarfs are not necessarily stars at all, but red, white, blue, orange, yellow and even black dwarfs certainly are classed as stars. When you start looking at big planets like Corot-3b (22Mj) they tend to describe them as 'planets or brown dwarfs', and the line in the sand defined as 'mass' can and does tend to overlap.

A very blurry line indeed.

Can planets become stars?

The natural follow up question.

Well I'm not sure how anybody would find an example of this happening, but the most massive 'planet or brown dwarf 'discovered so far is DENIS-P J082303.1-491201 b as a whopping 29 times the mass of Jupiter, easily enough to start fusion, but... it didn't.

Additionally, research from Michael C. Liu et al suggests that there is no fundamental difference between the formation of planets and stars, and they have in fact come across the rather newborn planet OTS44 and observed that it has a rather substantial disk of gas and accretion around it; the telltale signs that show up in the standard formation of stars. This gas has a combined mass of at least 30 earth's.

It's not too much to imagine this planet over time collecting enough mass, the same way a star would, to start fusion and convert itself into a star. So my answer for now is Yes, planets can become stars.

But you never will be, so get a real job.

get a job.jpg

Image Sources:

Size Comparison
Cute Star Size

Sort:  

Reading about astronomy and the wonders that are abound in the cosmos is surely interesting if not fascinating for most people, but it is a whole different thing to be able to convey with your writing revelations about the universe, that devise unreal vistas in one's mind's eye. Thanks for sharing @mobbs.

This is a meaningful comment, thanks! I'm not a real scientist, just passionate, so it's a good recipe for making things readable for people who otherwise might not know or care ^__^

Interesting and a fun read.
Upvoted!

Agreed, enjoyable read whilst still maintaining conciseness.

I'm glad you guys appreciate what I do =D

Very cool post, thank you for sharing!

Well written article and useful info.
Keep up sharing.
I have the pleasure to follow you :-)

Size is not what matters. As what we 'think' ;)

Very nice topic and very well written post, by the way!

I feel like I should ignore that wink at the end of your statement... lol

Thanks!

Yes, please ignore it. Better for me :p

Very interesting! But the ending was a bit uncalled for :P

Haha of course I didn't mean you. You're rocking dave!

Hey, I was once stopped in the street by somebody who recognized me, so for all I know I'm a goddamn rockstar if you are willing to bend the definition enough :P

Really enjoyed reading this. I wonder where the finer barrier is for star making like 12.998mj etc . I like thinking about whether a planet could become a star one day, gives me an idea for another story :) And still whenever i see deuterium crop up i remember that 1 in 6000 particles of water in a bottle will be a heavy hydrogen. mmm. haha... it blows my mind too much to try and imagine walking through fat gas :D